Tek wrote:
> Oh, I think I see what you mean. Yeah, that's a nice solution to a different> problem. I don't think it can quite handle the ludicrous complexity I'm trying> to achieve :)>
IMHO this comes down to 'pov ain't oo' - I don't think anyone denies
that oo capabilities in pov wouldn't be at the very least interesting,
but that's not the issue....
